Walking proves mobility, not labor substitution.
Track: Accepted units, falls, recovery, battery runtime, serviceability.
Robot Teardown
The public evidence says the body is no longer just a walking demo. The harder question is manipulation: hands, wrists, joints, tactile sensing and service cost.
Walking gets attention; manipulation decides whether a humanoid can substitute repeatable physical labor.
Track: Accepted units, falls, recovery, battery runtime, serviceability.
Track: Reducer volume, actuator SKUs, yield, noise, thermal behavior and replacement rate.
Track: Dexterous hand DOF, micro reducers, tactile feedback, task success and finger replacement cost.
Track: Sensor redundancy, calibration drift, safety case and intervention reduction.
Track: Runtime autonomy, intervention rate, data flywheel and edge-compute cost.
Company news lists micro harmonic reducers for dexterous hands and wrists; product intent is public, named OEM attachment is not.
IPO prospectus component table: three-finger dexterous hand for humanoid use, about 710g and ±2mm repeat fingertip precision.
IPO prospectus component table: five-finger hand, ±22° four-finger side swing and 4.5kg max load.
Extracted PDFs describe forearm-shifted tendon actuation; useful watchlist material, not primary-source proof.
Humanoid joint actuator range signals integrated actuation direction beyond discrete reducer parts.
Planetary roller screws / linear actuators matter for compact high-load limb drives.
Hand specifications do not prove uptime, intervention reduction, tool success or customer ROI.
Walking is necessary; task-reliable manipulation is the commercialization bottleneck.
Walking is necessary; task-reliable manipulation is the commercialization bottleneck.
Walking is necessary; task-reliable manipulation is the commercialization bottleneck.
Walking is necessary; task-reliable manipulation is the commercialization bottleneck.