US vs China

Frontier stack vs deployment / supply-chain machine

Industrial base calibration

China industrial robot installations🟢 IFR
295,000installations, 2024

54% of global demand; operational stock around 2.027m robots.

North America robot orders🟢 A3
31,311orders, 2024

A3 reported US$1.963bn order value; industrial automation benchmark, not humanoid-specific.

Leaderdrive harmonic reducer sales🟢 filing
425,158units, 2025

+72.48% YoY; supplier filing signal, not named humanoid OEM proof.

Path characteristics

US frontier stackTesla / Figure

Frontier AI, vertical OEM design, capital intensity, factory automation and named deployment KPI.

China deployment machineSupply chain + scenes

Industrial base, fast product iteration, component suppliers, government / enterprise scene funnels.

Stage differenceS3/S4

US leads visible frontier-humanoid proof; China leads component breadth and deployment experimentation.

Shared missing proofS5

Repeat paid deployment, robot revenue, customer ROI, uptime, intervention rate and gross margin.

Industrial division of labor

Vertical stack

Tesla

Needs scale supply, reducers/actuators, manufacturing yield and actual output.

Deployment proof

Figure

BMW KPI validates task execution; needs repeat economics and supply-chain scale-up.

Component density

China suppliers

Reducers, motors, drives, batteries, sensors and machining can shape humanoid cost curves.

Cost-access curve

China OEMs

Lower ASP and fast iteration may expand developer / pilot adoption before S5 economics.